[Gen-Streitfall] Fwd: GMW: US Big Food lobby calls on WTO to take action on EU labeling/Brazil labels GM food

Mo Apr 19 10:28:28 CEST 2004

Liebe Streitfall-Leute!

Hier eine weitere Ankündigung von überm Teich bezüglich Streitfall Nummer 2.

Gruß,
Andreas

---------------------------------------------------
GM WATCH daily
http://www.gmwatch.org
---
1.EU Biotech Labeling and Traceability Requirements 'Will Be a Serious
Barrier to International Trade'
2.Brazil labels GM food
3.Food Firms Reject GM Ingredients 
---
1.EU Biotech Labeling and Traceability Requirements 'Will Be a Serious
Barrier to International Trade,' Says NFPA
[shortened]
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&STORY=/www/story/04-16-2004/0002153208&EDATE=

WASHINGTON, April 16 /PRNewswire/ -- Commenting on the European Union's new
requirements for labeling and traceability of foods and feeds that contain
genetically modified ingredients, which become effective on April 18, John
R.
Cady, President and CEO of the National Food Processors Association (NFPA),
made the following statement:

"These new requirements establish a serious trade barrier that will keep
many U.S. food products out of the European market. European consumers
will see such labels on food products as 'warning labels.'  ...the
traceability requirements are a classic case of regulatory overkill, putting
complex
and detailed new requirements on food companies, with no benefit - but with
added expense - for consumers. NFPA has long opposed these labeling and
traceability requirements by the EU.  We strongly urge the World Trade
Organization
to address this issue, and take action to block these new, unnecessary
barriers to trade.

NFPA is the voice of the food processing industry on scientific and public
policy issues involving food safety, food security, nutrition, technical and
regulatory matters and consumer affairs.
---
2.Brazil labels GM food 
Luisa Massarani
16 April 2004
Source:
SciDev.Net
http://www.scidev.net/news/index.cfm?fuseaction=readnews&itemid=1329&language=1

[RIO DE JANEIRO] All human and animal food sold in Brazil that contains more
than one per cent genetically modified (GM) ingredients must now be labelled
under a law that came into force this month.

The law states that the packaging of GM products should be labelled with a
'T' — for 'transgenic' — no smaller than about 1 centimetre squared. It also
imposes fines of between US$65 and US$1 million on producers that flout the
new regulations.

Three organisations will be responsible for enforcing the law: the Ministry
of Agriculture and the National Health Surveillance Agency will take care of
agricultural and industry matters, respectively;

PROCONs, the state consumer-protection organisation will control commerce of
GM products.

At present, it is illegal to grow GM crops for commercial purposes in
Brazil. The only exception is GM soya illegally grown in 2003, which was
granted
special permission to be sold for both animal and human consumption (see
Brazil
to allow sale of illegally grown GM food and Brazil agrees to cultivation of
GM soya — for now).

Paradoxically, however, the new law does not require products containing the
2003 GM soya be labelled. Rather, the law states that the labels of such
products should include the information: "this may contain ingredients
produced
by GM soya" or "this may contain GM soya". 

The law has received a mixed reaction in the scientific community. Silvio
Valle, a biosafety expert at Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Rio de Janeiro,
questions why the legislation is stricter for products that are unlikely to
be found
on the Brazilian market, such as GM maize, than it is for illegally grown GM
soya, "which is a reality in our country".

He says that the law does not make clear whether imported GM products must
also be labelled. And he adds that it very unlikely that any labelled GM
products will appear in Brazilian supermarkets this year.

This is not the first time that Brazil has legislated on labelling GM food.
The government of ex-president Fernando Henrique Cardoso introduced a law
that products with more than 4 per cent GM ingredients should be labelled, a
limit that was reduced to one per cent in April 2003 by president Luiz
Inácio
'Lula' da Silva. However, neither of these laws was ever put into practice. 
---
3.Food Firms Reject GM Ingredients 
Apr 15 2004

http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/food_firms_reject_gm_ingre_15042004.html

The UK's biggest food companies will continue to reject GM ingredients in
their products when tougher GM labeling laws are introduced on Sunday 18th
April, a survey by Friends of the Earth has revealed. The news will be
welcomed
by consumers across the UK who made it clear that they do not want to eat GM
food. Meanwhile the UK Government, which opposed plans for tougher GM
labeling
rules to "minimise the risks" of alienating the US [1], is backing
applications for GM rice and sweetcorn to be imported into Europe. 

Under existing EU regulations, food containing one per cent or more of
genetically modified DNA must be labeled so that consumers can opt to avoid
it.
But on Sunday 18th April tougher GM labeling rules come in to effect which: 

*Cover `derivatives' from GM crops including oils and lecithin, both mainly
found in processed food; 
*Tighten the labeling threshold from one per cent to 0.9 per cent; 
*Include `feed' fed to animals. 
Friends of the Earth contacted the UK's leading supermarkets and food
manufacturers [see below] to question their policy on the new GM labeling
laws.
Most indicated that they do not expect to be required to label any of their
own-brand products when the new regulations come into force. The continuing
GM
ban is a result of clear anti-GM pressure from consumers. Last year the
Government embarked on a major public consultation on GM which found that
most
people said no to GM. Only eight per cent said they were happy to eat GM
food - 86
per cent were not. 

News that food companies are continuing to boycott GM ingredients will come
as a further blow to biotech firms. Last month it became clear that GM crops
would not be grown in the UK for the foreseeable future when Bayer ditched
plans to commercialise GM maize, despite qualified Government backing for
the
crop. The move means that the UK is likely to remain free from commercial GM
crops for the foreseeable future. 

Despite consumer hostility toward GM food, the UK Government continues to
support it at a European level, backing applications for GM rice and
sweetcorn
to be imported into the UK. If these crops are allowed to be imported into
the UK, it will be harder for companies to avoid GM contamination, and
undermine consumer efforts to choose GM-free food. 

Friends of the Earth's GM campaigner Clare Oxborrow said: 

"Food companies are rightly continuing to listen to UK consumers and saying
no to GM ingredients. This is good news for everyone who wants GM-free food.
But the UK Government continues to undermine efforts to keep Britain GM-free
by backing plans for GM rice and sweetcorn to be imported in to Britain. If
this happens it will be harder for companies and consumers to avoid GM. It's
time Mr. Blair abandoned the dangerous and unpopular GM experiment and
backed
healthy and sustainable food and farming instead." 

The United States Government has threatened to challenge the European GM
labeling scheme under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. The USA and a
handful of other countries have already launched a WTO case over Europe's de
facto
moratorium on the granting of new GM licenses on GM food and crops. 

Notes 
1. The UK Government opposed the labeling of GM derivatives, and the
tightening of the GM threshold to below 1 per cent. See:
http://news.scotsman.com/politics.cfm?id=610962003 

Responses 
Supermarkets 
J Sainsbury: 

"Based on the informal guidance received to date from the Food Standards
Agency (FSA) we see no reason for any changes that will be required to be
made
to the labeling of our own label foods." - Letter 31 April 2004 

M&S 

"as a 100 % own brand retailer we are able to offer our customers a very
clear proposition that all Marks & Spencer food is produced using non GM
ingredients and derivatives" - Letter 12 March 2004 

Waitrose: 

"I can confirm that Waitrose continues to obtain food and food ingredients
for Waitrose brand from conventional (rather than GM) sources and to
transport
and process them in a way designed to prevent accidental mixing with GM
material. Therefore there will be no changes to the labeling of Waitrose
brand
products as far as genetically modified ingredients are concerned." - Letter
10
March 2004 

Co-op: 

"With regard to our current product range and the impact of the impending EU
regulations, none of our range will require labeling as containing GM
ingredients" 

Budgens 

"..it will remain our policy to ensure that no own brand products contain GM
ingredients" 

Tesco: 

"Tesco does not…have any own-label GM foods on its shelves, and this will
not change as a result of the new EU legislation in April… the new
legislation
will mean that branded products on our shelves which have GM ingredients
will
have to be labeled, enabling the customer to make an informed choice." 

Morrisons/ Safeway: 

"We have removed GM ingredients and GM derivatives from all our own label
products. In accordance with current legislation we expect branded goods
that
contain GM ingredients to be clearly labelled to enable our shoppers to make
their own informed choice about what they are buying. 

Regarding GM animal feed, we are working with our suppliers to come up with
a solution that will support our existing policy." 

ASDA: 

"…we do not at this stage anticipate private label products requiring GM
labeling." 

Somerfield/ Kwiksave 

"Our position with regards to Genetic Modification remains unchanged. The
changes in the EU regulations will not affect our own label products or the
way
that we continue to produce them." 

Iceland: 

"Iceland own brand products have been made without GM ingredients since 1998
and we can confirm our commitment to this policy remains…The new regulations
will not lead to any change in this position." Letter 14 March 2004 

Others 
Unilever: 

"We do not expect there will be labelled products…" Dick Toot, Unilever -
phone conversation 6/4/04 

Associated British foods - 

All ABF brands are GM free - phone conversation. 

Nestle 

Nestlé recognises consumer concerns about different aspects of Genetically
Modified Organisms (GMOs) and therefore continues to provide non-GM
products. 

Cadbury Schweppes: 

"from 18th April 2004 the date the regulation occurs our products will not
require GM labeling." - e-mail 5 April 2004 

Contact details:

Friends of the Earth
26-28 Underwood St.
LONDON
N1  7JQ

Tel: 020 7490 1555
Fax: 020 7490 0881
Email: info at foe.co.uk
Website: www.foe.co.uk 

----------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as revolte_paysanne at gmx.de
To unsubscribe simply click the link below:
http://www.gmwatch.org/unsub.asp?ID=10&sec=xu3ye

This message has been sent because you subscribed to the GM Watch List.
http://www.gmwatch.org

------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
"Wir brauchen keine Bio-Terroristen, wenn wir Gentechniker haben."
Independent Science Panel (www.indsp.org)
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Binärdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : Andreas Bauer.vcf
Dateityp    : text/x-vcard
Dateigröße  : 111 bytes
Beschreibung: nicht verfügbar
URL         : <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/gen-streitfall/attachments/20040419/b141dea5/attachment.vcf>