[smartmontools-support] smartctl fails but badblocks succeeds
Alex
mysqlstudent at gmail.com
Sat Jun 25 15:38:56 CEST 2022
Hi all,
I hoped I could reply to my question from some time ago with more info.
Here is a link to the output from smartctl for two drives I think are
failing. Would someone help me confirm?
The first one doesn't have all that many hours on it.
1. Model Family: Western Digital Caviar Black
2. Device Model: WDC WD1502FAEX-007BA0
1. Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours)
LBA_of_first_error
2. # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 80% 25420 556876652
https://pastebin.com/P2uvFxfa
I've also tried to run badblocks on the area around that bad sector, and
it's succeeded.
1. Model Family: Western Digital Caviar Black
2. Device Model: WDC WD1002FAEX-00Z3A0
3. Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours)
LBA_of_first_error
4. # 1 Short offline Completed: read failure 90% 57452 642360
https://pastebin.com/PQUfS222
Any ideas greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Alex
On Sun, Jun 12, 2022 at 5:29 PM Alex <mysqlstudent at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an older WD1502FAEX 1.5TB disk that fails a smartctl short and long
> test at virtually the same place on the disk with a read error. However,
> running badblocks over the same place on the disk where smartctl fails has
> no problem, even after multiple read/write passes.
>
> Which test do I believe? Is this a reliable disk?
>
> If they're just read errors, isn't there some mechanism to relocate those
> bad sectors or just mark them as unusable and move on?
>
> This disk is being tested on another system or I otherwise would have
> provided more actual output here. Please let me know if there's something
> specific I can provide to help determine how I should proceed.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/smartmontools-support/attachments/20220625/9e9a469d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Smartmontools-support
mailing list