[Postfixbuch-users] Adressierung mit Plus +

[Stefan Pampel antispam]

Hallo Liste,

ich habe auf im postfix noch ein ungelöstet Problem mit Plus (+)
Adressierung. Es sieht so aus, als würde das Anhängsel verschluckt.
Mails kommen grundsätzlich an.

in der main.cf ist auch ein entsprechender Eintrag:
 recipient_delimiter = +

Hat noch jemand eine Idee?

eine Mail an user+spam at foo.org kommt wie folgt an:

<snip>
Return-Path: <foobar at gmail.com>
Received: from foo.org ([unix socket])
	 by foo.org (Cyrus v2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-14+b3) with LMTPA;
	 Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B24EF4D11
	for <user at foo.org>; Tue,  2 Dec 2008 20:44:21 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
	tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from foo.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (foo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id ggSVa5nIr8Oq for <user at foo.org>;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-qy0-f21.google.com (mail-qy0-f21.google.com
[209.85.221.21])
	by foo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DEDE01D5A
	for <user+spam at foo.org>; Tue,  2 Dec 2008 20:44:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by qyk14 with SMTP id 14so3861085qyk.11
        for <user+spam at foo.org>; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
         :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-disposition;
        bh=OsY01wpTsRs9wg12b8CJsXpNhhRKn9VYCZ0l9cxhl5Q=;
        b=h9NS27DnBzXhMGBpPICUp2U5tEwgbn+ouAhGLuYteBJnMWw5hIQ4vj+d8bNn8TzV4E

DNtPqxGU0QXa55JsPSjYZU4yZyCk5kA1oCNacatnsWRY2LvrVtdUS7spqAYZWNpxsXas
         z78A3NBawCutspEj0pOlUbfwNLDDrnjK20Ce8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=dvgd4c6c5TbTVmP0TibQyKDSpojbNRDZTIbmWt5DV9TMvTfdHmBtxL+564/pci7phD

4knxRl2MUb483WxZJcKazltQuT5+WtoxN0Ljg2xtqGEc+EijyG9NMCno/CtQSIA82Mg+
         FWG33nCiGc/cAxhGSQo+oe0LMtap+BZVHYNIM=
Received: by 10.214.183.9 with SMTP id g9mr12118283qaf.35.1228247059060;
        Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.214.182.8 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 11:44:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <fe5446ec0812021144o6d3270b7x372ae0cdbc7cec5 at mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:44:19 +0100
From: "Stefan Pampel" <foobar at gmail.com>
To: user <user+spam at foo.org>
Subject: 123
</snip>

Wen jemand einen Tipp hat?

Vielen Dank

Stefan Pampel