[Postfixbuch-users] Ist DATE statt Date im Header RFC konform?

Danijel Tasov postfix-de at ml.rbfh.de
So Apr 1 00:54:29 CEST 2007


Christian Maier wrote:
> Ich würde meinem Kunden gern sagen, dass ein RFC diese Großschreibung
> nicht zuläßt. Ist RFC2822, Sektion 3.6.1 die richtige Antwort?
> ...
> The origination date field consists of the field name "Date"
> followed by a date-time specification

Also:

RFC2822
  1.2.2. Syntactic notation

     This standard uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation
     specified in [RFC2234] for the formal definitions of the syntax of
     messages.  Characters will be specified either by a decimal value
     (e.g., the value %d65 for uppercase A and %d97 for lowercase A) or by
     a case-insensitive literal value enclosed in quotation marks (e.g.,
     "A" for either uppercase or lowercase A).  See [RFC2234] for the full
     description of the notation.
  [...]
  orig-date       =       "Date:" date-time CRLF

RFC2234:

   Hence:

        rulename = "abc"

   and:

        rulename = "aBc"

   will match "abc", "Abc", "aBc", "abC", "ABc", "aBC", "AbC" and "ABC".


Also bin ich fuer case-insensitive.

                                        Danijel Tasov
                                        <dt at rbfh.de>
-- 
I want to see people using Perl to glue things together creatively, not
just technically but also socially.
             -- Larry Wall in <199702111730.JAA28598 at wall.org>



Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Postfixbuch-users