[Postfixbuch-users] Ist DATE statt Date im Header RFC konform?
Danijel Tasov
postfix-de at ml.rbfh.de
So Apr 1 00:54:29 CEST 2007
Christian Maier wrote:
> Ich würde meinem Kunden gern sagen, dass ein RFC diese Großschreibung
> nicht zuläßt. Ist RFC2822, Sektion 3.6.1 die richtige Antwort?
> ...
> The origination date field consists of the field name "Date"
> followed by a date-time specification
Also:
RFC2822
1.2.2. Syntactic notation
This standard uses the Augmented Backus-Naur Form (ABNF) notation
specified in [RFC2234] for the formal definitions of the syntax of
messages. Characters will be specified either by a decimal value
(e.g., the value %d65 for uppercase A and %d97 for lowercase A) or by
a case-insensitive literal value enclosed in quotation marks (e.g.,
"A" for either uppercase or lowercase A). See [RFC2234] for the full
description of the notation.
[...]
orig-date = "Date:" date-time CRLF
RFC2234:
Hence:
rulename = "abc"
and:
rulename = "aBc"
will match "abc", "Abc", "aBc", "abC", "ABc", "aBC", "AbC" and "ABC".
Also bin ich fuer case-insensitive.
Danijel Tasov
<dt at rbfh.de>
--
I want to see people using Perl to glue things together creatively, not
just technically but also socially.
-- Larry Wall in <199702111730.JAA28598 at wall.org>
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste Postfixbuch-users