[Postfixbuch-users] Numerische Domains RFC

[Matthias Haegele]

Luigi di Lazzaro schrieb:
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.09.2006, 10:20 +0200 schrieb giuseppe at potenza.de:
> Hallo,
> 
> [numerische Domains]
>> kann mir jemand sagen, ob Numerische Domains in der Art 0451.com RFC-Konform sind?
> Das direkt nicht, aber scheinbar soll es in Österreich (bald?) möglich sein solche zu
> registrieren, dann allerdings mit dem Suffix .at.

Jetzt? Ab Die 19.09.06:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/78299

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-Name-System#Domain-Namensraum

http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1034.txt


> For example, when naming a mail domain, the user should satisfy both the
> rules of this memo and those in RFC-822.  When creating a new host name,
> the old rules for HOSTS.TXT should be followed.  This avoids problems
> when old software is converted to use domain names.
> 
> The following syntax will result in fewer problems with many
> 
> applications that use domain names (e.g., mail, TELNET).
> 
> <domain> ::= <subdomain> | " "
> 
> <subdomain> ::= <label> | <subdomain> "." <label>
> 
> <label> ::= <letter> [ [ <ldh-str> ] <let-dig> ]
> 
> <ldh-str> ::= <let-dig-hyp> | <let-dig-hyp> <ldh-str>
> 
> <let-dig-hyp> ::= <let-dig> | "-"
> 
> <let-dig> ::= <letter> | <digit>
> 
> <letter> ::= any one of the 52 alphabetic characters A through Z in
> upper case and a through z in lower case
> 
> <digit> ::= any one of the ten digits 0 through 9
> 
> Note that while upper and lower case letters are allowed in domain
> names, no significance is attached to the case.  That is, two names with
> the same spelling but different case are to be treated as if identical.


Vmtl. die Frage des OP wg. Spam von z.B.: 0734.ru|com etc ...?

(Habe sowas noch nicht bei legitimer Mail gesehen oder irre ich?)

> Gruß
> Luigi

hth
MH