[FoME] UN's historic freedom of information agreement

Ute Lange ute.lange at dw.com
Mo Sep 28 17:25:28 CEST 2015

UN's historic freedom of information agreement 

By Christian Gramsch, Director, DW Akademie

The most crucial item carried by most refugees on their difficult journeys 
are their smartphones. Why? Because smartphones are sources of vital 
information – for mapping routes, receiving updates about the political 
situation, making their journeys safer, and hearing from their loved ones. 
Smartphones also allow refugees to share their experiences and communicate 
with others. Here we are talking about fundamental human rights: the right 
to freedom of movement, the right to physical integrity, the right to 
family, and the right of freedom of expression and information.

Alongside other basic rights, the United Nations has included the right to 
access information as part of their Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), 
which were adopted this past weekend at the UN Sustainable Development 
Summit 2015 in New York. 

This is a historic step.

It is historic because it is the first time that a global development 
agreement is committing to advancing freedom of information. The 17 goals 
in the UN's Agenda for Sustainable Development go further than the 
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) adopted in 2000. As well as tackling 
issues like poverty, hunger and disease, the SDGs incorporate goals such 
as economic growth, social participation and environmental protection. 

The new universal goals also demonstrate global solidarity – they apply 
equally to all of the 193 UN member states regardless of whether they are 
a developing or an industrial nation. 

Freedom to information is set out clearly in goal 16, under target 16.10 
to: “ensure public access to information and protect fundamental freedoms, 
in accordance with the national legislation and international agreements.”

But is a commitment like this actually going to make the world a better 

The answer is no, and yes.

No, because the target's wording is vague and ambiguous. Because the 
target doesn't mention 'media' or 'freedom of expression'. Because the 
target refers to national legislation, but such legislation is often weak 
and poorly implemented, if at all, and makes it an ill-suited point of 

No, because all the new goals and their associated 169 targets are 
surprisingly conventional given the world is in the middle of a digital 
revolution. The goals and targets fail to acknowledge how information 
technology, data and global connectivity can help reach the development 
goals. While universal and affordable Internet services are included 
elsewhere as a separate target, this is foreseen as an economic measure, 
not a fundamental right driving social and political development. The 
agenda fails to incorporate a pledge not to misuse the Internet for 
surveillance purposes, and to close the digital divide between those with 
unfettered access to information technology and those who only have 
limited or no access whatsoever. 

And no, because at this stage, the goals and their targets are abstract 
formulations and no one really knows whether they can be achieved by 2030.

Considering the extensive and controversial political discussions 
surrounding the SDGs, we expected more. The UN member states should have 
included goals for freedom of expression and independent media (both 
conventional and digital) as well, instead of only committing to freedom 
of information. 

However, there are several good reasons to answer the question with a yes.

Yes, because target 16.10 is a chance to advance the flow of free and 
independent information and communication. The issue is now on the 
international agenda, and we can – and must – discuss how we go on from 

Freedom of expression and information are not just fundamental rights; 
they are also prerequisites for realizing other human rights. This hold 
true for refugees with smartphones, patients and doctors facing the Ebola 
crisis in West Africa, and Ukrainians seeking information in a time of 
armed conflict.

Only when people have access to relevant information and can freely 
express their opinions can they actively help solve their own problems. 
The link between freedom of expression and democracy, good governance, 
peace and economic development has been demonstrated in numerous studies. 
There is a positive correlation between independent media and reduced 
corruption, political stability, a more effective rule of law, a higher 
per capita income, and increased public spending on health.

An example of this is Mongolia. Over the past few years the country, which 
shares borders with Russia and China, has laid the legal basis for freedom 
of the press. Despite various setbacks, press freedom is progressing and 
the quality of reporting has improved. At the same time, the economy is 
growing and civil society is using its new found opportunities to 
contribute to the democratization process.

Conversely, authoritarian political systems, weak markets and restrictive 
laws weaken freedom of expression, and as such, weaken development as a 
whole. The East African country of Burundi is a case in point. Political 
unrest has not only paralyzed the nation's economy, it has also crippled 
freedom of the press and access to information. Journalists in Burundi 
live in fear, and numerous media companies have been forced to shut down.

But there is another, more important reason why target 16.10 can make the 
world a better place. The inclusion of access to information in an 
international agreement means states have to act upon it. 

DW Akademie, as part of Germany's international broadcaster, DW, has been 
active in this regard for the last 50 years. From its beginning as a 
journalism training center, DW Akademie has developed into an organization 
that focuses on wide-ranging, long-term development projects. DW Akademie 
provides comprehensive consulting services to its partners, and we work 
collaboratively with our partners to navigate the changing digital world. 

Mongolia serves again as an example of this. Consultants from DW Akademie 
were involved in transforming the country’s state broadcaster into a 
public-service broadcaster. We are now supporting civil society 
stakeholders in founding a media council and are strengthening 
investigative journalism initiatives. 

But we are also active in countries with more adverse conditions. In 
Burundi, for example, DW Akademie media experts are working with local 
radio stations in remote areas – such stations are often the only source 
of information for rural populations. We are also involved in media 
literacy projects for school children and citizen journalists.

Things now need to move ahead at the UN level. Once the goals are signed, 
the UN still has to agree on indicators to monitor whether the goals are 
being met. DW Akademie, on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for 
Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), is involved in discussions 
with UN expert committees in this regard.

There is still much to do to advance freedom of expression and freedom of 
information, and in this way, advance other human rights as well. Because 
the UN's new Sustainable Development Goals are only sustainable when the 
situation improves for all of those suffering from displacement, poverty, 
ill-health and oppression.

Commentary published on DW Akademie website and on the Huffington Post's 
German site. 

Beste Grüße

Ute Lange
Leiterin Kommunikation
Hauptabteilung Training und Kommunikation
DW Akademie

Deutsche Welle (DW)
Kurt-Schumacher-Str. 3
53113 Bonn

T +49.228.429-2099
F +49.228.429-2060
M +49.173.7008759
T +49.30.4646-8508 (Berlin)
ute.lange at dw.com

-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde abgetrennt...
URL: <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/fome/attachments/20150928/2e272ecf/attachment.htm>
-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Binärdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname   : nicht verfügbar
Dateityp    : image/jpeg
Dateigröße  : 9133 bytes
Beschreibung: nicht verfügbar
URL         : <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/fome/attachments/20150928/2e272ecf/attachment.jpe>

Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste FoME