Testers needed for history completion

[Florian Bruhin]

Hi!

@toofar on github and I started working on history completion, and it
seems to work pretty well by now! However I want some feedback
(especially on performance) before merging this.

Can you please test the histcomplete branch? When you got the git
repo, you can simply do 'git pull' and 'git checkout histcomplete'.

Then check how using 'o' feels, and if the performance is acceptable.
If it is,  :set completion web-history-max-items -1   then restart
qutebrowser and test again.

Things which potentially could be sluggish:

- Opening the completion the first time with 'o'.
- Using 'o' after the first time.
- Using 'o' and typing (without using the completion)
- Scrolling the completion (with tab and scrollbar/mousewheel)

Also, it'd be good to know what this says for you:

    sort ~/.local/share/qutebrowser/history | cut -d' ' -f2 | uniq | wc -l

See https://github.com/The-Compiler/qutebrowser/pull/547 for
discussions.

Thanks!

Florian

-- 
http://www.the-compiler.org | me at the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
   GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
         I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://listi.jpberlin.de/pipermail/qutebrowser/attachments/20150314/c094a0a0/attachment.sig>