[Pirateninfo] Herbal medicine boom threatens plants
pcl at jpberlin.de
pcl at jpberlin.de
Fre Sep 17 18:25:19 CEST 2004
Nicht mehr taufrisch (New Scientist Online News 08 January 04), aber
ging wohl noch nicht über den Verteiler.
Gruß,
Peter.
Herbal medicine boom threatens plants
The multimillion-pound boom in herbal medicine is threatening to wipe
out up to a fifth of the plant species on which it depends, wrecking
their natural habitats and jeopardising the health of millions of
people in developing countries. And yet the herbal medicines industry
has been accused of doing nothing about it.
Most people around the globe use herbal medicine for everyday
healthcare, with as many as 80 per cent relying on it in some
countries. But two-thirds of the 50,000 medicinal plants in use are
still harvested from the wild, and research to be published later in
2004 suggests that between 4000 and 10,000 of them may now be
endangered.
A study by Alan Hamilton, a plant specialist from the global
environment network WWF, will point out that the market for herbal
remedies in North America and Europe has been expanding by about 10
per cent a year for the last decade and the world market is now
thought to be worth at least £11 billion. Many of the plants are
harvested by poor communities in India and China whose livelihoods
will suffer if the plants die out.
"It's an extremely serious problem," Hamilton told New Scientist. He
is a member of the World Conservation Union's Medicinal Plants
Specialist Group, and has drawn his estimates of the number of
species at risk from expert analyses of the IUCN's Red List of
threatened plants. His study is due to be published in Biodiversity
and Conservation.
Anti-cancer drugs
Hamilton has also helped compile a report, Herbal Harvests with a
Future, which is due to be unveiled next week by the conservation
group Plantlife International. "With demand and commercialisation
growing fast, the future of the wild plants which have helped most of
humanity for centuries is now more uncertain than it has ever been,"
says the group's Martin Harper.
One species highlighted by Plantlife as being under threat is tetu
lakha (Nothapodytes foetida), a small tree found in rainforests in
south India and Sri Lanka and used for anti-cancer drugs in Europe.
Others include a saw-wort known as costus or kusta (Saussurea lappa)
from India whose root is used for chronic skin disorders, and the
tendrilled fritillary (Fritillaria cirrhosa) from Sichuan, China,
used to treat respiratory infections.
Although the crisis has been looming for years, Plantlife accuses the
herbal medicine industry of failing to ensure the sustainability of
its supplies. It has established that 11 of 16 herbal companies in
the UK, for instance, harvest all the plants they sell from the wild,
and the remaining five grow only a small proportion.
A leading UK natural skin care company, The Body Shop International,
accepts that it does not grow its own medicinal plants, but insists
that it is environmentally aware. "The protection of flora and fauna
is an integral part of The Body Shop approach to products. We do not
source materials derived from endangered and threatened species,"
says a company spokeswoman in London.
Health fads
But Plantlife says awareness of the environmental problems among
companies in general is limited and sometimes vague. "Given the scale
of the threat, this is alarming," Harper warns. "It is time for the
industry to join forces with environmental organisations to ensure
that herbal harvests have a sustainable future."
Another leading international expert on medicinal plants, Gerard
Bodeker from Green College, Oxford, thinks that the assessments of
the crisis by Hamilton and Plantlife are conservative. Most of the
processes involved in supplying the growing market for herbal
remedies are "the result of unsustainable and often destructive
practices driven by poverty", he says.
The industry is characterised by changing health fads which keep
favouring different plants, so there is little incentive to
sustainably produce particular species, he argues. "They are eating
their own nest. They are not replacing what they take."
The market for African cherry (Prunus africana), the bark of which is
popular in Europe as a treatment for prostate enlargement, has
collapsed because too many trees have been destroyed. In the past the
trees, which grow in Africa's mountain regions, survived because
traditionally less than half of their bark was harvested.
But according to a recent study by Kristine Stewart, from consultants
Keith and Schnars in Florida, growing commercial pressures have led
to whole forests being stripped or felled. Exports of dried bark
halved between 1997 and 2000 and the main exporter, Plantecam, had to
close its extraction factory in Cameroon (Journal of
Ethnopharmacology, vol 89, p 3).
Lack of education
In its report, Plantlife urges the industry to invest in cultivation.
It also proposes the introduction of a kite mark to identify products
that have been sustainably harvested.
"There is a complete lack of awareness and lack of education amongst
consumers," Bodeker says. Although those that use herbal medicines
might be expected to be more environmentally aware than most, that
does not seem to be the case. "They don't make the links," he adds.
The UK's largest association of herbal practitioners, the National
Institute of Medical Herbalists, is very concerned. "We all need to
work together to address this issue and to put pressure on
suppliers," the institute's Trudy Norris says.