[Pirateninfo] EU BACKS POOR FARMERS' SEED USE

[Martin Sundermann]

EU BACKS POOR FARMERS' SEED USE
February 3, 2003
BBCNews
Alex Kirby
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2719129.stm
The European Union is proposing two far-reaching curbs on the power of the
biotechnology industry.
It says companies seeking patents should have to say where they found any
natural product they are appropriating.
The EU also says poor farmers should be free to continue their traditional
practice of saving and exchanging seeds, even ones already patented.
The proposals will be discussed by the World Trade Organisation (WTO).
They are outlined by the EU trade commissioner, Pascal Lamy, in the magazine
Our Planet, published by the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep).
The governing council of Unep is meeting at its headquarters here from 3 to
7 February, and will be discussing ways to tackle poverty and environmental
destruction by using poor countries' genetic resources to benefit them.
Traditional knowledge
The problem the EU is worried about is bio-piracy - the determination by
some companies in developed countries to find and control natural resources
or traditional knowledge simply for profit.
The 1993 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) tries to make sure that
the benefits are shared between the exploiters and the communities from
which they take their resources.
But many countries think the CBD may be fatally damaged by the Trade-Related
Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (Trips), agreed in 1995.
Mr Lamy says: "Indigenous or local groups in developing countries are right
to expect to benefit materially if their traditional knowledge is applied in
ways that are shared via commercial initiatives and trade.
"The EU is working on ways of helping developing countries rich in
traditional knowledge to identify it and prevent it being undervalued or
abused."
Seed exchange
So the EU is contributing a paper to be discussed by the Trips council,
exploring its relationship with the CBD.
Mr Lamy says: "The key proposal in the paper is a means of obliging
applicants for patents who have used the fruits of bio-prospecting [taking
knowledge from developing countries] for new products to disclose the
geographical origin of any biological material used in biotech inventions.
"At present, there is no such obligation. The paper also supports the idea
of providing better protection for traditional knowledge, and recognises the
right of subsistence farmers in developing countries to re-use and exchange
seeds, even those covered by intellectual property rights, via so-called
farmers' exemptions.
"Larger-scale commercial farmers would stay subject to more stringent
rules."
If the EU's proposals are accepted, they will mean poor farmers need no
longer fear they will be forced to buy fresh seeds annually from bio-tech
companies, instead of saving some from the previous crop.
'Common good'
Farmers fear they might have to buy new seeds each year if the ones sold by
the companies had been patented and modified to make sure they produce only
one harvest.
Acceptance of the proposals could mean traditional communities gaining real
benefits from sharing their knowledge and resources.
Unep's executive director, Dr Klaus Toepfer, says in Our Planet the
benefit-sharing which the CBD exists to promote "is all too often not
working - or working too imperfectly.
"Sadly the genetic resources of one country or community are often treated
as a public common good, owned by nobody, free for all, without property
rights."
It looks likely that Unep will come out strongly in favour of the sort of
approach Mr Lamy has outlined.
Whether the WTO will agree to do so is another story, though - and so is the
willingness of some bio-prospectors to honour any agreement that may be
reached.

-------------- nächster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit HTML-Daten wurde geschreddert...
URL: http://ilpostino.jpberlin.de/pipermail/info-mail/attachments/20030206/1f325156/attachment-0001.htm