[fyeg_gen-l] What To Expect From Bush
ndebono at ba-malta.org
Wed Dec 18 11:09:07 CET 2002
WHAT TO EXPECT FROM BUSH
Frustrated that Iraq appears to be cooperating with the United Nations'
intrusive weapons inspections, the Bush Administration is rushing this week
to proclaim that the so-called disarmament effort has failed: that
inspections are an empty effort and the 12,000 page Iraqi declaration is
It is urgent that the anti-war movement not be lulled into a false sense of
optimism because Iraq and the UN are cooperating. Various governments are
reporting that they are hopeful that the inspections process can help avoid
war. UN General Secretary Kofi Annan went out of his way to say that war is
However, the extent to which the world is voicing cautious optimism about a
peaceful solution, is also the extent to which the Bush foreign policy team
is racing to dash all hope for such an outcome. There is now an almost
perfect inverted ratio between the worldwide clamor for restraint and peace
and the Bush Administration's eagerness to publicly announce that war is
By the end of this week, we can expect that Bush will try to announce that
Iraq has failed to come clean about its purported weapons program. Then the
war mobilization can go onto automatic pilot and the gauntlet will be thrown
down to the vacillators: "Are you with Us or Them?" In so doing, the White
House will inadvertently reveal a truth known to all objective observers of
this conflict -- that the disarmament of Iraq was never really the issue.
The nuclear scare was to keep Americans frightened of the "enemy" as the
Bush Hawks frantically prepared to wage aggression against a country that
possesses 10% of the world's known oil reserves.
The administration has a real objective and a stated objective. The real
objective is to wage war against Iraq and conquer and occupy that country.
To do so requires 1) overwhelming force and 2) the elimination of dissenting
opposition that can derail Bush's dreams of empire. The U.S. has massive
force. But it has encountered formidable opposition from people around the
world and in the United States. So, the Bush administration shifted its
claimed objective from regime change to disarmament, a much more palatable
purported objective for public distribution and one that can be embraced by
even those who support peace.
The White House wants to get the people of the U.S. behind this claimed
objective of "disarmament." Once having done so, the administration can
insist that the mechanisms in place for the purported disarmament have
failed, or cannot accomplish the task, and that military might is necessary.
There is only one reason that makes the war drive rapidly escalate in the
face of the apparent success of the new inspections process: The Bush
Administration has never intended the "inspections" process to serve as
anything but a trigger for war. This is why the Iraqi cooperation with the
inspection process and disclosure has failed to produce even the slightest
slowing in the preparations for war and, in fact, has seemed to produce an
escalation in the rhetoric from Washington, including recent policy
statements confirming Bush's plans for first-use deployment of nuclear
weapons. The Washington Post reported that a classified version of the new
Bush Doctrine "breaks with the fifty years of counter-proliferation efforts"
by planning for the use of nuclear weapons against countries that not only
have not attacked the US but that do not themselves possess nuclear
capability ("Preemptive Strikes are Part of U.S. Strategic Doctrine," front
page, December 11, 2002).
These signals from the White House and Pentagon provide no basis for
optimism to believe that the war has been averted. The inspections process,
whose true purpose is solely to serve as a trigger for war, at the moment is
not providing the political cover that Washington needs to attack Iraq and
seize its oil and land.
The warmongers in the Bush Administration will need now to manufacture other
circumstances to justify an attack and occupation of Iraq.
The Bush Administration rammed Resolution 1441 through the Security Council
for one reason: to provide the diplomatic fig leaf for a US war. To the
extent that the process serves as a political restraint, Bush and Co. will
scuttle the process.
The Administration now needs a new trigger. It will use the resolution 1441
to create an obvious source of provocation. The U.S. forced language into
the resolution that would allow for the forcible removal of Iraqi
scientists, government officials, and their families and children to be held
incommunicado in other countries and interrogated by U.N. inspectors.
The U.S. wants to abduct Iraqi officials and interrogate them planning that
by threat or bribe one will help create the trigger that the U.S.
desperately needs and the "evidence" that the U.S. has long claimed to have
but has never put up. One need only remember the Gulf of Tonkin resolution,
the Pentagon Papers, or even the lie manufactured about the Iraqi army
throwing babies out of incubators (put in cite) to judge the quality of
results likely produced by this effort.
In the New York Times for December 16, 2002, William Safire urges that Iraqi
scientists should be visited at home, removed to other countries by
helicopter on the spot, and be threatened that they must provide the right
answers in order to "ameliorate sentences at war-crimes trials." And of
course, any failure of Iraq to facilitate these abductions will itself be
considered "material breach" of the Security Council resolution.
There is really only one restraint that can block the war. It lies within
the people themselves. Neither Congress nor the Security Council will stop
Bush's dangerous war drive. The optimism of the antiwar forces must be
premised on reality. If we can mobilize the millions - in the US and around
the world - and ignite a firestorm of activism then the political climate
can be changed, and changed dynamically.
Public opinion is Bush's enemy. Time is also an enemy for the warmakers.
With each passing the day antiwar momentum grows. The global desire for a
peaceful outcome is considered subversive because from that sentiment can
emerge a potent mass movement - as happened during the Vietnam era.
With the cooperation of the Corporate-owned media, the White House has
attempted to create a false myth of consensus about the war. False polls,
false reports and non-stop propaganda have filled the airwaves so that the
American people will be paralyzed and confused. Yet people all over the
country are talking to their neighbors, co-workers, fellow students, and
congregations and learning that they too oppose Bush's war, that there is,
in fact, widespread, deep, and passionate opposition to the war.
When hundreds of thousands marched on October 26th, the same corporate media
tried to whiteout the sudden emergence of this movement. But they were
confronted by overwhelming demand for truth from people across the country
and some were forced to correct their coverage.
The peoples movement continues to grow by leaps and bounds.
On January 18, massive protest will again fill the streets of Washington DC
and San Francisco. Thousands of cities, towns, college campuses, high
schools, religious and civil rights organizations are mobilizing together.
The scenario for January 18th includes a brief rally on the West side of the
Capitol Building in Washington DC starting at 11 am, followed by a massive
march to the Washington DC Navy Yard -- a massive military installation
located in a working class neighborhood in Southeast Washington DC that
parks warships on the Anacostia River. We will demand the immediate
elimination of US weapons of mass destruction and a people's inspection team
will call for unfettered access and a full declaration of U.S.
non-conventional weapons systems.
*How YOU can GET INVOLVED*
HELP SPREAD THE WORD!
Download a new flyer at:
If you are unable to open or print the flyer, call us at 202-544-3389and we
can mail you an original copy or a stack of flyers.
UPDATE ON THE SCENARIO AND POLITICS OF JAN. 18:
(scroll down to find update)
To find out about TRANSPORTATION FROM YOUR CITY or SIGN UP AS AN ORGANIZING
CENTER, go to:
To VIEW ENDORSERS or ADD YOUR ENDORSEMENT, go to:
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
dc at internationalanswer.org
New York 212-633-6646
Los Angeles 213-487-2368
San Francisco 415-821-6545
Executive Committee Member
Young General Assembly
rateb at globalyouth.com
More information about the fyeg_gen-l